Remissão total do zumbido pediátrico: relato dos resultados de uma abordagem não medicamentosa da disfunção tubária / Total remission of pediatric tinnitus: reporting the results of a non-drug approach to tubal dysfunction / Remisión total del acufeno pediátrico: informe de los resultados de un enfoque no farmacológico a la disfunción tubárica

Introdução: Zumbido é um sintoma crescente na população pediátrica e sua multifatoriedade etiológica demanda amplas investigações para utilizar-se adequadas intervenções. Objetivos: relatar os efeitos de uma abordagem não medicamentosa em um caso de remissão total do zumbido pediátrico oriundo da disfunção tubária. Método: Este artigo apresenta um indivíduo com sete anos, do sexo feminino e com queixa de zumbido crônico associado a disfunção tubária, considerado escasso na literatura. Além disso, este estudo descreve as avaliações médicas (neurológica e otorrinolaringológica), a avaliação audiológica e psicoacústica do zumbido, o processo diagnóstico e a intervenção fonoaudiológica realizada. Utilizou-se uma abordagem não medicamentosa que contemplou exercícios miofuncionais orofaciais, Manobra de Valsalva e limpeza nasal. Resultados: Após um mês de intervenção, com a prática diária dos exercícios, o indivíduo estudado referiu ausência da percepção do sintoma e das demais queixas auditivas. Este resultado também foi constatado nas avaliações audiológicas. Conclusão: A abordagem não medicamentosa da disfunção tubária demonstrou bons resultados frente ao manejo do zumbido crônico, para o presente caso. (AU)

Introduction: Tinnitus is a growing symptom in the pediatric population and its etiological multifactorial demands extensive investigations to use appropriate interventions. Objective: report the effects of a non-medicated approach of a case of total remission of pediatric tinnitus from tube dysfunction. Methods: This article presents a seven-year-old female patient with a complaint of chronic tinnitus associated with tubal dysfunction, considered rare in the literature. Besides that, this study describes the medical evaluations (neurological and otorhinolaryngological), the audiological and psychoacoustic evaluations of the tinnitus, the diagnostic process and the speech-language intervention performed. It was used a non-medication approach that included orofacial myofunctional exercises, Valsalva maneuver and nasal cleaning. Results: After a month of intervention, with the daily practice of exercises, the studied subject reported the absence of perception of the symptom and other auditory complaints. This result was also verified in the audiological evaluations. Conclusion: The non-medication approach to tubal dysfunction has shown good results in relation to the management of chronic tinnitus for the present case. (AU)

Introducción: Acufeno es un síntoma creciente en la población pediátrica y su multifatoriedad etiológica demanda amplias investigaciones para utilizar adecuadas intervenciones. Objetivos: Informar los efectos de un enfoque no farmacológico de un caso de remisión total del acufeno pediátrico oriundo de la disfunción tubárica. Metodos: Este artículo presenta un sujeto con siete años, del sexo femenino y con queja de acufeno crónico asociado a disfunción tubárica, considerado escaso en la literatura. Además, este estudio describe las evaluaciones médicas (neurológica y otorrinolaringológica), la evaluación audiológica y psicoacústica del zumbido, el proceso diagnóstico y la intervención fonoaudiológica realizada. Se utilizó un abordaje no medicamentoso que contempló ejercicios miofuncionales orofaciales, Maniobra de Valsalva y limpieza nasal. Resultados: Después de un mes de intervención, con la práctica diaria de los ejercicios, el sujeto estudiado refirió ausencia de la percepción del síntoma y de las demás quejas auditivas. Este resultado también se constató en las evaluaciones audiológicas. Conclusión: El abordaje no medicamentoso de la disfunción tubárica demostró buenos resultados frente al manejo del acufeno crónico, para el presente caso. (AU)

Treinamento auditivo cognitivo em sujeitos após COVID-19: uma análise dos efeitos da intervenção em adultos / Cognitive auditory training in subjects after COVID-19: an analysis of the effects of the intervention in adults

RESUMO Objetivo analisar a eficácia de um plano de intervenção terapêutica por meio de um programa de treinamento auditivo cognitivo já existente, adaptado para adultos, após um ano de infecção por COVID-19. Métodos participaram do estudo 13 sujeitos, entre 18 e 59 anos de idade, quatro do gênero masculino e nove do gênero feminino. Todos foram submetidos a um questionário, inspeção visual do meato acústico externo, audiometria tonal liminar, logoaudiometria e medidas de imitância acústica, como procedimentos de seleção. Foram realizados, na avaliação e na reavaliação, os seguintes procedimentos: avaliação do processamento auditivo central, avaliação neuropsicológica breve-NEUPSILIN, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale e o Potencial Cognitivo - P300, com estímulo de fala. O treinamento auditivo cognitivo foi realizado em seis sessões consecutivas, em campo aberto, com duração de, aproximadamente, 50 minutos. Em todas as análises foi considerado o nível de significância de 5% (p≤0,05). Resultados na comparação das variáveis entre os períodos, pré e pós-intervenção, houve diferença estatisticamente significativa no Teste Dicótico de Dígitos (p = 0,009), no Teste Padrão de Frequência (p = 0,020) e no Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (p = 0,001). Houve tendência à significância (p < 0,10) no teste Gap in Noise e na Atenção Total. Conclusão o treinamento auditivo cognitivo demonstrou ser uma estratégia terapêutica eficaz para o tratamento de adultos com queixas de compreensão de fala e de cognição após infecção por COVID-19.

ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention plan through an existing cognitive auditory training program, adapted for adults, after one year of COVID-19 infection. Methods 13 subjects, between 18 and 59 years old, four males and nine females participated in the study. All underwent anamnesis, visual inspection of the external acoustic meatus, pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry and acoustic immitance measurements as selection procedures. For the research, the following procedures were carried out in the evaluation and reassessment: evaluation of central auditory processing, brief neuropsychological evaluation - NEUPSILIN, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale and the Cognitive Potential - P300 with speech stimulus. Cognitive auditory training was carried out in six consecutive sessions, in an open field, lasting approximately 50 minutes. In all analyses, a significance level of 5% (p≤0.05) was considered. Results When comparing the variables between the periods, pre and post intervention, there was a statistically significant difference in the Dichotic Digit Test (p = 0.009), in the Frequency Pattern Test (p = 0.020) and in Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (p = 0.001). And a tendency to significance (p < 0.10) in the Gap in Noise test and Total Attention. Conclusion Cognitive auditory training proved to be an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of adults with speech comprehension and cognition complaints after COVID-19 infection.

Cortical auditory-evoked potential as a biomarker of central auditory maturation in term and preterm infants during the first 3 months.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze central auditory maturation in term and preterm infants during the first 3 months of life by comparing the latency and amplitude of cortical auditory-evoked potential at different frequencies. METHODS: In this study, 17 term and 18 preterm infants were examined; all had tested positive on the neonatal hearing screening test. Cortical auditory potential was investigated during the first and third months of life. The response of the cortical auditory-evoked potential was investigated at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The latency and amplitude of the cortical response were automatically detected and manually analyzed by three researchers with experience in electrophysiology. The results were compared using analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test. A significance level of 5% was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Latency values of cortical auditory-evoked potential in the first month of birth were significantly higher than those in the third month, and latency values of the preterm group were higher than those of the term group, regardless of the frequency and time of evaluation. In general, the latency of the cortical auditory-evoked potential was higher at high frequencies. Amplitude values in the third month of life were significantly higher than those in the first month for term and preterm infants. CONCLUSION: Central auditory maturation was observed in both groups but with different results between those born at term and preterm, with latencies of cortical auditory-evoked potential higher for the preterm group and at high frequencies.

Potencial evocado auditivo Mismatch Negativity em músicos adultos / Mismatch Negativity auditory evoked potentials in adult musicians / Potencial evocado auditivo Mismatch Negativity en músicos adultos

Introdução: Mismatch Negativity (MMN) é um exame objetivo que não depende da realização de tarefas nem da atenção do sujeito. Tem sido utilizado para estudar o processamento auditivo relacionado à detecção automática de mudanças auditivas. Objetivo: Analisar latências e amplitudes do MMN em músicos adultos e comparar os resultados com um grupo controle de não músicos normouvintes. Método: Estudo transversal e comparativo. A amostra foi composta por 69 sujeitos, 40 sujeitos não músicos (grupo controle) e 29 sujeitos músicos (grupo estudo) todos com no mínimo três anos de experiência musical e idades superiores a 18 anos. Todos realizaram avaliação auditiva periférica e o MMN. Resultados: A média das latências e amplitudes do grupo controle foram, respectivamente, 173,61ms (±49.80) e 4,25µV (±3.60) e do grupo estudo foram, respectivamente, 144,23ms (±17.58) e 5,12µV (±2.73). Houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos por orelha (p<0,05), sendo a média das latências e amplitudes do grupo estudo de 140,08ms na orelha direita e 148,37ms na orelha esquerda, e 4,83µV na orelha direita e 5,41µV na orelha esquerda. Conclusão: O grupo de músicos apresentou melhores resultados, como menor latência e maior amplitude do MMN, evidenciando melhor processamento do estímulo acústico em nível central.

Introduction: Mismatch Negativity (MMN) is an objective exam that does not depend on the subjects' task performance or attention. It is regularly used to study auditory processing relative to the automatic detection of auditory changes. Objective: To analyze the latencies and amplitudes of MMN in adult musicians and compare the results with those of the control group of normal hearing non-musicians. Methods: This is a cross sectional and comparative study. The sample consisted of 69 subjects, aged between 18 and 59 years, with 40 non-musician subjects (control group) and 29 musicians (study group) with at least 3 years of musical expertise, and ages over 18 years. All patients were assessed by peripheral auditory evaluation and MMN. Results: The mean latencies and amplitudes were 173.61 ms (±49.80) and 4.25µV (±3.60) in the control group, and 144.23 ms (±17.58) and 5.12µV (±2.73) in the study group. There was a significant difference between the groups per ear (p<0.05), and the mean latencies and amplitudes in the study group were 140.08 ms in the right ear and 148.37 ms in the left while the values of amplitude were 4.83µV in the right ear and 5.41µV in the left ear. Conclusion: The musicians presented better results for MMN, such as lower latency and greater amplitude, showing evidence of improved acoustic stimulus processing at the central level.

Introduccion: Mismatch Negativity (MMN) es un examen objetivo que no depende del desempeño de las tareas ni de la atención del sujeto. Se há utilizado para estudiar el procesamiento auditivo relacionado com la detección automática de câmbios auditivos. Objetivo: Analizar las latencias y amplitudes del MMN en músicos adultos y comparar los resultados con un grupo de control de músicos normales. Metodos: Estudio transversal y comparativo. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 69 sujetos, 40 sujetos no musicales (grupo de control) y 29 sujetos músicos (grupo de estudio) todos con al menos tres años de experiencia musical y mayores de 18 años. Todos se sometieron a evaluación de audición periférica y MMN. Resultados: El promedio de las latencias y amplitudes del grupo control fueron, respectivamente, 173.61ms (± 49.80) y 4.25µV (± 3.60) y del grupo de estudio, respectivamente, 144.23ms (± 17.58) y 5.12 µV (± 2,73). Hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los grupos por oído (p <0.05) y el promedio de las latencias y amplitudes del grupo estudiado fue de 140.08ms en el oído derecho y 148.37ms en el oído izquierdo, y 4.83µV en el oído derecho y 5 .41 µV en el oído izquierdo. Conclusión: El grupo de músicos presentó mejores resultados, como menor latencia y mayor amplitud MMN, mostrando un mejor procesamiento del estímulo acústico a nivel central.

Cortical auditory-evoked potential as a biomarker of central auditory maturation in term and preterm infants during the first 3 months

OBJECTIVES: To analyze central auditory maturation in term and preterm infants during the first 3 months of life by comparing the latency and amplitude of cortical auditory-evoked potential at different frequencies. METHODS: In this study, 17 term and 18 preterm infants were examined; all had tested positive on the neonatal hearing screening test. Cortical auditory potential was investigated during the first and third months of life. The response of the cortical auditory-evoked potential was investigated at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The latency and amplitude of the cortical response were automatically detected and manually analyzed by three researchers with experience in electrophysiology. The results were compared using analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test. A significance level of 5% was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Latency values of cortical auditory-evoked potential in the first month of birth were significantly higher than those in the third month, and latency values of the preterm group were higher than those of the term group, regardless of the frequency and time of evaluation. In general, the latency of the cortical auditory-evoked potential was higher at high frequencies. Amplitude values in the third month of life were significantly higher than those in the first month for term and preterm infants. CONCLUSION: Central auditory maturation was observed in both groups but with different results between those born at term and preterm, with latencies of cortical auditory-evoked potential higher for the preterm group and at high frequencies.

Cortical auditory evoked potential in assessment of neonates: a study about minimum level of responses in term and preterm newborns / Potencial evocado auditivo cortical na avaliac¸ão de neonatos: um estudo sobre o nível mínimo de respostas em nascidos a termo e pré-termos

Abstract Introduction: The study of the threshold level of cortical auditory response in adults has been investigated in previous studies. Due to maturational issues, little is known about these responses in neonates. Technological advances with automatic analysis devices now allow investigation in specific populations. Thus, new studies are needed to establish the feasibility of using this auditory potential to identify the lowest levels of responses in children. Objective: Verify and compare latency and amplitude in 80 dBnNA and the minimum level of cortical auditory response in term and preterm neonates. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative study involving 59 neonates, 35 full-term births and 24 preterm births, with positive results in the Neonatal Hearing Screening. The Hearlab system was used to investigate the P1i auditory potential with tone burst stimulus at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. The minimum response level search ranged from 80 to 0 dBNA and was detected automatically. The results were compared between groups, evaluating the latency and amplitude in 80 dBNA and the minimum level of cortical auditory response. Results: The mean values obtained for the minimum level of cortical auditory response in term group were 26 ± 8.81; 26.14 ± 6.97; 29 ± 7.65 and 29.43 ± 7.04 dBNA and for preterm neonates of 31.96 ± 10.41; 34.13 ± 11.34; 33.64 ± 11.03 and 37.73 ± 11.92 dBNA, for the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. There was a difference between groups for the latency of P1i at 4000 Hz and the minimum response levels at 500, 1000 and 4000 Hz, with higher values for preterm infants. Conclusion: It was possible to obtain latency and amplitude values at 80 dBnNA and the minimum level of cortical response in term and preterm newborns, with different results between groups, with higher values in those born preterm.

Resumo Introdução: A investigação do nível mínimo de resposta auditiva cortical tem sido alvo de diferentes estudos em adultos. Devido a questões de maturação, pouco se sabe sobre essas respostas em recém-nascidos. Com o avanço tecnológico, dispositivos de análise automática surgiram com o objetivo de retomar essa avaliação em populações específicas. Assim, novos estudos são necessários para verificar a viabilidade do uso desse potencial auditivo na obtenção de níveis mínimos de respostas na criança. Objetivo: Verificar e comparar latência e amplitude em 80 dBnNA e o nível mínimo de resposta auditiva cortical em recém-nascidos a termo e pré-termo. Método: Estudo transversal, comparativo, envolvendo 59 neonatos, 35 nascidos a termo e 24 pré-termos, com resultados positivos na triagem auditiva neonatal. O sistema Hearlab foi utilizado para investigar o potencial auditivo P1i com estímulo tone burst nas frequências de 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000 Hz. A busca do nível mínimo de resposta variou de 80 a 0 dBNA e foi detectado automaticamente. Os resultados foram comparados entre os grupos, avaliando a latência e amplitude em 80 dBNA e o nível mínimo de resposta auditiva cortical. Resultados: Os valores médios obtidos para o nível mínimo de resposta auditiva cortical no grupo nascido a termo foram 26 ± 8,81; 26,14 ± 6,97; 29 ± 7,65 e 29,43 ± 7,04 dBNA e para recém-nascidos pré-termos foram de 31,96 ± 10,41; 34,13 ± 11,34; 33,64 ± 11,03 e 37,73 ± 11,92 dBNA, para as frequências de 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000 Hz, respectivamente. Houve diferenc¸a entre os grupos para a latência de P1i em 4000 Hz e os níveis mínimos de resposta em 500, 1000 e 4000 Hz, com valores maiores em Pré-termos. Conclusão: Foi possível obter valores de latência e amplitude em 80 dBnNA e o nível mínimo de resposta cortical em recém-nascidos a termo e Pré-termos, com resultados diferentes entre osgrupos, com valores maiores em pré-termos.

Comparison between click and ce-chirp® stimuli in neonatal hearing screening / Comparação dos estímulos clique e ce-chirp® na triagem auditiva neonatal

BACKGROUNG:OBJECTIVE: To compare the application time of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (A-ABR) between the click and CE-Chirp® stimuliMETHODS: Forty-six newborns were evaluated without risk indicators for hearing loss and presenting transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). The A-ABR was performed with Interacoustics® Titan equipment in a hospital, with the click and CE-Chirp® stimuli at the same time. Descriptive statistical analyses and inferential statistics analyses (Student's t-test calculation for mean comparisons among independent samples) were used for the variables age, gender, examination time, laterality and test stimulus usedRESULTS: Of the 46 neonates in the sample, 23 were male and 23 female. The mean age of the sample was 23.1 days. The mean procedure time using the Click stimulus was 85.9 seconds for the right ear and 86.1 seconds for the left ear, whereas for the use of the CE-Chirp® stimulus the results obtained for the right and left ear were28.4 seconds and 27.9 seconds, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean times obtained through the CE-Chirp® and Click stimuli for both ears (p=0.000). There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison between the right and left ears or between females and malesCONCLUSION: It was found that the mean duration of the A-ABR procedure using the CE- Chirp® stimulus is three times lower than with the Click stimulus

INTRODUÇÃO:OBJETIVO: Comparar o tempo de aplicação do Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico Automático (PEATE-A) entre os estímulos clique e CE-Chirp®MÉTODO: Foram avaliados 46 recém-nascidos sem indicadores de risco para perda auditiva e que apresentavam emissões otoacústicas evocadas por estímulo transiente (EOAT) presentes. O PEATE-A foi realizado com o equipamento Titan da Interacoustics® em ambiente hospitalar, com os estímulos clique e CE-Chirp®na mesma ocasião. As análises estatísticas descritivas e análises estatísticas inferenciais (cálculo do teste t de Studentpara comparações de médias entre amostras independentes) foram utilizadas para as variáveis idade, gênero, tempo de exame, lateralidade e estímulo de teste utilizadoRESULTADOS: Dos 46 recém-nascidos da amostra, 23 são do sexo masculino e 23 do sexo feminino. A idade média da amostra foi de 23,1 dias. O tempo médio do procedimento usando o estímulo clique foi de 85,9 segundos para a orelha direita e 86,1 segundos para a orelha esquerda, enquanto que para o uso do estímulo CE-Chirp®foram obtidos resultados para a orelha direita e esquerda de 28,4 segundos e 27,9 segundos respectivamente. Houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os tempos médios obtidos por meio dos estímulos CE-Chirp® e Clique para ambas as orelhas (p=0,000). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante na comparação entre as orelhas direita e esquerda ou entre o sexo feminino e masculinoCONCLUSÃO: Verificou-se que o tempo médio de realização do procedimento PEATE-A com uso do estímulo CE-Chirp® é três vezes menor do que com estímulo Clique

Cortical auditory evoked potential in assessment of neonates: a study about minimum level of responses in term and preterm newborns.

INTRODUCTION: The study of the threshold level of cortical auditory response in adults has been investigated in previous studies. Due to maturational issues, little is known about these responses in neonates. Technological advances with automatic analysis devices now allow investigation in specific populations. Thus, new studies are needed to establish the feasibility of using this auditory potential to identify the lowest levels of responses in children. OBJECTIVE: Verify and compare latency and amplitude in 80dBnNA and the minimum level of cortical auditory response in term and preterm neonates. METHODS: A cross-sectional, comparative study involving 59 neonates, 35 full-term births and 24 preterm births, with positive results in the Neonatal Hearing Screening. The Hearlab system was used to investigate the P1i auditory potential with tone burst stimulus at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz. The minimum response level search ranged from 80 to 0dBNA and was detected automatically. The results were compared between groups, evaluating the latency and amplitude in 80dBNA and the minimum level of cortical auditory response. RESULTS: The mean values obtained for the minimum level of cortical auditory response in term group were 26±8.81; 26.14±6.97; 29±7.65 and 29.43±7.04dBNA and for preterm neonates of 31.96±10.41; 34.13±11.34; 33.64±11.03 and 37.73±11.92dBNA, for the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz, respectively. There was a difference between groups for the latency of P1i at 4000Hz and the minimum response levels at 500, 1000 and 4000Hz, with higher values for preterm infants. CONCLUSION: It was possible to obtain latency and amplitude values at 80dBnNA and the minimum level of cortical response in term and preterm newborns, with different results between groups, with higher values in those born preterm.

Automated cortical auditory evoked potentials threshold estimation in neonates / Estimativa do limiar de potenciais evocados auditivos corticais automatizados em recém-nascidos

Abstract Introduction: The evaluation of cortical auditory evoked potential has been the focus of scientific studies in infants. Some authors have reported that automated response detection is effective in exploring these potentials in infants, but few have reported their efficacy in the search for thresholds. Objective: To analyze the latency, amplitude and thresholds of cortical auditory evoked potential using an automatic response detection device in a neonatal population. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, observational study. Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded in response to pure-tone stimuli of the frequencies 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz presented in an intensity range between 0 and 80 dB HL using a single channel recording. P1 was performed in an exclusively automated fashion, using Hotelling's T2 statistical test. The latency and amplitude were obtained manually by three examiners. The study comprised 39 neonates up to 28 days old of both sexes with presence of otoacoustic emissions and no risk factors for hearing loss. Results: With the protocol used, cortical auditory evoked potential responses were detected in all subjects at high intensity and thresholds. The mean thresholds were 24.8 ± 10.4 dB NA, 25 ± 9.0 dB NA, 28 ± 7.8 dB NA and 29.4 ± 6.6 dB HL for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. Conclusion: Reliable responses were obtained in the assessment of cortical auditory potentials in the neonates assessed with a device for automatic response detection.

Resumo Introdução: O potencial evocado auditivo cortical tem sido o foco de estudos científicos. Alguns autores observaram que a detecção automatizada de respostas é eficaz na exploração desses potenciais em lactentes, mas poucos relataram sua eficácia na busca de limiares. Objetivo: Analisar a latência, a amplitude e os limiares do potencial evocado auditivo cortical em recém-nascidos, com o uso de um dispositivo de detecção automática de resposta. Método: Estudo transversal, observacional. Os potenciais evocados auditivos corticais foram registrados em resposta a estímulos de tons puros nas frequências de 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000 Hz e apresentados em uma faixa de intensidade entre 0-80 dBNA, com o uso de gravação de canal único. O P1 foi feito de forma exclusivamente automática, com o uso do teste estatístico T2 de Hotelling. A latência e a amplitude foram obtidas manualmente por três examinadores. O estudo incluiu 39 recém-nascidos com até 28 dias de ambos os sexos, com presença de emissões otoacústicas e sem fatores de risco para perda auditiva. Resultados: Com o protocolo usado, as respostas dos PEAC foram detectadas em todos os indivíduos em alta intensidade e limiares. Os limiares médios foram 24,8 ± 10,4 dBNA, 25 ± 9,0 dBNA, 28 ± 7,8 dBNA e 29,4 ± 6,6 dBNA para 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000 Hz, respectivamente. Conclusão: Foram obtidas respostas confiáveis na avaliação dos potenciais auditivos corticais em recém-nascidos com um dispositivo para detecção de resposta automática.

Automated cortical auditory evoked potentials threshold estimation in neonates.

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation of cortical auditory evoked potential has been the focus of scientific studies in infants. Some authors have reported that automated response detection is effective in exploring these potentials in infants, but few have reported their efficacy in the search for thresholds. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the latency, amplitude and thresholds of cortical auditory evoked potential using an automatic response detection device in a neonatal population. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, observational study. Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded in response to pure-tone stimuli of the frequencies 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz presented in an intensity range between 0 and 80dB HL using a single channel recording. P1 was performed in an exclusively automated fashion, using Hotelling's T2 statistical test. The latency and amplitude were obtained manually by three examiners. The study comprised 39 neonates up to 28 days old of both sexes with presence of otoacoustic emissions and no risk factors for hearing loss. RESULTS: With the protocol used, cortical auditory evoked potential responses were detected in all subjects at high intensity and thresholds. The mean thresholds were 24.8±10.4dB NA, 25±9.0dB NA, 28±7.8dB NA and 29.4±6.6dB HL for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz, respectively. CONCLUSION: Reliable responses were obtained in the assessment of cortical auditory potentials in the neonates assessed with a device for automatic response detection.

Visual Reinforcement Audiometry and Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential in infants with and without conductive impairment / Audiometria de Reforço Visual e Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável em crianças com e sem comprometimento condutivo

ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the findings of minimum levels of answers through air and bone conductions between the Visual Reinforcement Audiometry and the Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential in infants from six to twelve months, with and without conductive disorder. Methods: sixty children aged six to twelve months were evaluated, 30 presenting conductive disorder, and 30 not presenting it. Children with malformation in the external auditory meatus with neurological alteration and / or genetic syndrome were excluded, as well as patients with sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. The infants were subjected to Visual Reinforcement Audiometry and Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential evaluation through air and bone conduction on the same day. The results of both assessments were compared and correlated. Results: in the comparison through air conduction, for the group without conductive disorder of the medium ear, the minimum levels of response for 500 and 1000Hz were lower (better thresholds) for Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential in both ears, and through bone conduction were very similar in all frequencies. Concerning the infants that present conductive disorder, the responses through air conduction were better in all frequencies evaluated when obtained via Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential test. Through bone conduction, the results were very similar for both groups. Conclusion: it was possible to compare the findings to the minimum levels of response through air and bone conductions between the Visual Reinforcement Audiometry and the Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential, being that the comparison for bone conduction in both groups presents an equivalence in the results, being very similar. In addition, for the air conduction, in the control group, there was proximity of responses of some frequencies, while the values for the Steady-State Auditory Evoked Potential test were better than the behavioral responses in the conductive disorder group.

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar os níveis mínimos de resposta por via aérea e via óssea entre a Audiometria de Reforço Visual e o Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável nas crianças de seis a 12 meses, com e sem comprometimento condutivo. Métodos: foram avaliadas 60 crianças de seis a doze meses, sendo 30 com e 30 sem comprometimento condutivo. Foram excluídas crianças com má formação no meato acústico externo, com alteração neurológica e/ou síndrome genética, além de portadores de perda auditiva neurossensorial ou mista. As crianças foram submetidas à Audiometria de Reforço Visual e Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável por via aérea e via óssea no mesmo dia. Os resultados das duas avaliações foram comparados e correlacionados entre si. Resultados: na comparação por via aérea para o grupo sem comprometimento de orelha média os níveis mínimos de resposta para 500 e 1000Hz foram menores (melhores limiares) para o Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável em ambas as orelhas e por via óssea foram muito similares em todas as frequências. Para as crianças com comprometimento condutivo, as respostas por via aérea foram melhores para todas as frequências avaliadas quando obtidas por meio do Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável. Por via óssea foram muito similares para ambos os grupos. Conclusão: foi possível comparar os achados para os níveis mínimos de resposta por via aérea e via óssea entre a Audiometria de Reforço Visual e o Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável, sendo que a comparação para a via óssea em ambos os grupos, traz uma equivalência nos valores, sendo estes muito similares. Ainda, para a via aérea, no grupo controle, houve valores aproximados entre as respostas de algumas frequências, enquanto que no grupo com comprometimento condutivo os valores do Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável foram melhores que as respostas comportamentais em todas as frequências pesquisadas.

Privação sensorial auditiva e sua relação com os potenciais evocados auditivos de longa latência / Auditory sensory deprivation and its relation with auditory evoked potentials of long latency / Privación sensorial auditiva y su relación con los potenciales evocados auditivos de larga latencia

Objetivo: verificar se o tempo de privação sensorial auditiva de até cinco anos em indivíduos com perda auditiva neurossensorial de grau leve ou moderado pode influenciar nas respostas dos Potenciais Evocados Auditivos de Longa Latência (PEALL). Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, transversal e quantitativo. Foram avaliados 14 sujeitos, com idade entre 52 e 76 anos, com perda auditiva neurossensorial de grau leve ou moderado simétrico, que estavam na fila de espera de um programa de concessão de próteses auditivas e possuíam entre dois e cinco anos de privação sensorial auditiva. Para apresentação do PEALL foram utilizados estímulos verbais e foram analisados os potenciais N1, P2 e P300. Resultados: A média de idade dos sujeitos foi de 63,5 anos e do tempo de privação auditiva foi de 3,3 anos. Houve diferença entre o número de sujeitos normais e alterados para N1, sendo maior o número de normais, já para P2 e P300 não houve diferença. Ao comparar o resultado normal e alterado nos potenciais com a idade e tempo de privação, não houve diferença significativa. Conclusão: O tempo de privação auditiva entre dois e cinco anos em indivíduos com perda auditiva neurossensorial de grau leve ou moderado, não influenciou nos resultados dos PEALL.

Objective: To verify whether auditory sensory deprivation time of up to five years, in individuals with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss may influence the Long-Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (LLAEP) responses. Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional, and quantitative study. Were assessed 14 subjects, aged 52 to 76 years, with symmetric mild or moderate sensorineural hearing loss, who were waiting for a hearing aid program and had between two and five years of auditory sensory deprivation. For the presentation of the LLAEP, verbal stimuli were used and the potentials N1, P2 and P300 were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 63.5 years and the time of hearing deprivation was 3.3 years. There was a difference between the number of normal and altered subjects for N1, with a higher number of normal individuals, whereas for P2 and P300 there was no difference. When comparing the normal and altered outcome in the potentials with age and time of deprivation, there was no significant difference. Conclusion: The time of hearing deprivation between two and five years in individuals with mild or moderate sensorineural hearing loss did not influence the results of the LLAEP.

Objetivo: verificar si el tiempo de privación sensorial auditiva de hasta cinco años en individuos con pérdida auditiva neurosensorial de grado leve o moderado puede influir en las respuestas de los Potenciales Evocados Auditivos de Larga Latencia (PEALL). Métodos: estudio prospectivo, transversal y cuantitativo. Fueron evaluados 14 sujetos, con edad entre 52 y 76 años, con pérdida auditiva neurosensorial de grado leve o moderado simétrico, que estaban en línea de espera de un programa de concesión de prótesis auditivas y tenian entre dos y cinco años de privación sensorial auditiva. Para la presentación del PEALL fueron utilizados estímulos verbales y fueron analizados los potenciales N1, P2 y P300. Resultados: el promedio de edad de los sujetos fue de 63,5 años y del tiempo de privación auditiva fue de 3,3 años. Hubo diferencia entre el número de sujetos normales y alterados para N1, el mayor número siendo normales, ya para P2 y P300 no hubo diferencia. Al compararse el resultado normal y alterado en los potenciales con la edad y tiempo de privación, no hubo diferencia significativa. Conclusión: el tiempo de privación auditiva entre dos y cinco años en individuos con pérdida auditiva neurosensorial de grado lele o moderado, no influyó en los resultados de los PEALL.

Efeito do estado atencional na detecção automática das respostas auditivas corticais em neonatos / Effect of the arousal state on automatic detection of cortical auditory evoked responses in neonates

RESUMO Objetivo O objetivo desse estudo foi comparar a latência e amplitude do potencial evocado auditivo cortical P1i entre neonatos em estado de alerta e durante o sono leve. Métodos Vinte e cinco neonatos com emissões otoacústicas evocadas transientes presentes foram testados, por meio do potencial evocado auditivo cortical (PEAC), sendo dez em estado de alerta e 15 durante o sono leve. Para pesquisa dos potenciais corticais, utilizou-se o equipamento Hearlab System, de um canal, no módulo Cortical Tone Evaluation (CTE). O potencial P1i foi pesquisado de forma monoaural, na intensidade de 80 dBnNA, para as frequências de 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000Hz. A detecção do P1i foi feita de maneira automática pelo equipamento. A marcação da latência e amplitude foi realizada por três juízes. Resultados Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os dois grupos de neonatos para os valores de amplitude e latência, nas quatro frequências testadas. Conclusão Não houve influência do estado comportamental dos neonatos na avaliação do potencial cortical P1i.

ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of the present study was to compare latency and amplitude of the cortical auditory evoked response P1i among newborns in an alert state and during light sleep. Methods Twenty-five neonates with normal transient evoked otoacoustic emissions were tested with cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): 10 were in an alert state and 15 in light sleep during testing. For the investigation of cortical potentials, a single-channel Hearlab System equipment, Cortical Tone Evaluation module (CTE), was used. The P1i potential was investigated monoaurally at an 80dBnHL intensity at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. P1i was automatically detected by the equipment. Latency and amplitude were marked by three judges. The responses of the newborn in an alert state were compared with those in light sleep. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of neonates for the amplitude and latency values at the four tested frequencies. Conclusion There was no influence of the neonates' behavioral state on the evaluation of the P1i auditory cortical potential.

Air and Bone Conduction Frequency-specific Auditory Brainstem Response in Children with Agenesis of the External Auditory Canal.

Introduction The tone-evoked auditory brainstem responses (tone-ABR) enable the differential diagnosis in the evaluation of children until 12 months of age, including those with external and/or middle ear malformations. The use of auditory stimuli with frequency specificity by air and bone conduction allows characterization of hearing profile. Objective The objective of our study was to compare the results obtained in tone-ABR by air and bone conduction in children until 12 months, with agenesis of the external auditory canal. Method The study was cross-sectional, observational, individual, and contemporary. We conducted the research with tone-ABR by air and bone conduction in the frequencies of 500 Hz and 2000 Hz in 32 children, 23 boys, from one to 12 months old, with agenesis of the external auditory canal. Results The tone-ABR thresholds were significantly elevated for air conduction in the frequencies of 500 Hz and 2000 Hz, while the thresholds of bone conduction had normal values in both ears. We found no statistically significant difference between genders and ears for most of the comparisons. Conclusion The thresholds obtained by bone conduction did not alter the thresholds in children with conductive hearing loss. However, the conductive hearing loss alter all thresholds by air conduction. The tone-ABR by bone conduction is an important tool for assessing cochlear integrity in children with agenesis of the external auditory canal under 12 months.

Air and Bone Conduction Frequency-specific Auditory Brainstem Response in Children with Agenesis of the External Auditory Canal

Abstract Introduction The tone-evoked auditory brainstem responses (tone-ABR) enable the differential diagnosis in the evaluation of children until 12 months of age, including those with external and/or middle ear malformations. The use of auditory stimuli with frequency specificity by air and bone conduction allows characterization of hearing profile. Objective The objective of our study was to compare the results obtained in tone-ABR by air and bone conduction in children until 12 months, with agenesis of the external auditory canal. Method The study was cross-sectional, observational, individual, and contemporary. We conducted the research with tone-ABR by air and bone conduction in the frequencies of 500 Hz and 2000 Hz in 32 children, 23 boys, from one to 12 months old, with agenesis of the external auditory canal. Results The tone-ABR thresholds were significantly elevated for air conduction in the frequencies of 500 Hz and 2000 Hz, while the thresholds of bone conduction had normal values in both ears. We found no statistically significant difference between genders and ears for most of the comparisons. Conclusion The thresholds obtained by bone conduction did not alter the thresholds in children with conductive hearing loss. However, the conductive hearing loss alter all thresholds by air conduction. The tone-ABR by bone conduction is an important tool for assessing cochlear integrity in children with agenesis of the external auditory canal under 12 months.

Longitudinal Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Pretermand Term Infants: The Maturation Process

Abstract Introduction Preterm neonates are at risk of changes in their auditory system development, which explains the need for auditory monitoring of this population. The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) is an objective method that allows obtaining the electrophysiological thresholds with greater applicability in neonatal and pediatric population. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the ASSR thresholds in preterm and term infants evaluated during two stages. Method The study included 63 normal hearing neonates: 33 preterm and 30 term. They underwent assessment of ASSR in both ears simultaneously through insert phones in the frequencies of 500 to 4000Hz with the amplitude modulated from 77 to 103Hz. We presented the intensity at a decreasing level to detect the minimum level of responses. At 18 months, 26 of 33 preterm infants returned for the new assessment for ASSR and were compared with 30 full-term infants. We compared between groups according to gestational age. Results Electrophysiological thresholds were higher in preterm than in full-term neonates (p < 0.05) at the first testing. There were no significant differences between ears and gender. At 18 months, there was no difference between groups (p > 0.05) in all the variables described. Conclusion In the first evaluation preterm had higher thresholds in ASSR. There was no difference at 18 months of age, showing the auditory maturation of preterm infants throughout their development.

Auditory Evoked Potential Mismatch Negativity in Normal-Hearing Adults

Abstract Introduction Mismatch Negativity (MMN) corresponds to a response of the central auditory nervous system. Objective The objective of this study is to analyze MMN latencies and amplitudes in normal-hearing adults and compare the results between ears, gender and hand dominance. Methods This is a cross-sectional study. Forty subjects participated, 20 women and 20 men, aged 18 to 29 years and having normal auditory thresholds. A frequency of 1000Hz (standard stimuli) and 2000Hz (deviant stimuli) was used to evoked the MMN. Results Mean latencies in the right ear were 169.4ms and 175.3ms in the left ear, with mean amplitudes of 4.6μV in the right ear and 4.2μV in the left ear. There was no statistically significant difference between ears. The comparison of latencies between genders showed a statistically significant difference for the right ear, being higher in the men than in women. There was no significant statistical difference between ears for both right-handed and left-handed group. However, the results indicated that the latency of the right ear was significantly higher for the left handers than the right handers. We also found a significant result for the latency of the left ear, which was higher for the right handers. Conclusion It was possible to obtain references of values for the MMN. There are no differences in the MMN latencies and amplitudes between the ears. Regarding gender, the male group presented higher latencies in relation to the female group in the right ear. Some results indicate that there is a significant statistical difference of the MMN between right- and left-handed individuals.

Longitudinal Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Preterm and Term Infants: The Maturation Process.

Introduction Preterm neonates are at risk of changes in their auditory system development, which explains the need for auditory monitoring of this population. The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) is an objective method that allows obtaining the electrophysiological thresholds with greater applicability in neonatal and pediatric population. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the ASSR thresholds in preterm and term infants evaluated during two stages. Method The study included 63 normal hearing neonates: 33 preterm and 30 term. They underwent assessment of ASSR in both ears simultaneously through insert phones in the frequencies of 500 to 4000Hz with the amplitude modulated from 77 to 103Hz. We presented the intensity at a decreasing level to detect the minimum level of responses. At 18 months, 26 of 33 preterm infants returned for the new assessment for ASSR and were compared with 30 full-term infants. We compared between groups according to gestational age. Results Electrophysiological thresholds were higher in preterm than in full-term neonates ( p < 0.05) at the first testing. There were no significant differences between ears and gender. At 18 months, there was no difference between groups ( p > 0.05) in all the variables described. Conclusion In the first evaluation preterm had higher thresholds in ASSR. There was no difference at 18 months of age, showing the auditory maturation of preterm infants throughout their development.

Auditory Evoked Potential Mismatch Negativity in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Introduction Mismatch Negativity (MMN) corresponds to a response of the central auditory nervous system. Objective The objective of this study is to analyze MMN latencies and amplitudes in normal-hearing adults and compare the results between ears, gender and hand dominance. Methods This is a cross-sectional study. Forty subjects participated, 20 women and 20 men, aged 18 to 29 years and having normal auditory thresholds. A frequency of 1000Hz (standard stimuli) and 2000Hz (deviant stimuli) was used to evoked the MMN. Results Mean latencies in the right ear were 169.4ms and 175.3ms in the left ear, with mean amplitudes of 4.6µV in the right ear and 4.2µV in the left ear. There was no statistically significant difference between ears. The comparison of latencies between genders showed a statistically significant difference for the right ear, being higher in the men than in women. There was no significant statistical difference between ears for both right-handed and left-handed group. However, the results indicated that the latency of the right ear was significantly higher for the left handers than the right handers. We also found a significant result for the latency of the left ear, which was higher for the right handers. Conclusion It was possible to obtain references of values for the MMN. There are no differences in the MMN latencies and amplitudes between the ears. Regarding gender, the male group presented higher latencies in relation to the female group in the right ear. Some results indicate that there is a significant statistical difference of the MMN between right- and left-handed individuals.

Resolução temporal e potenciais corticais em diferentes níveis de proficiência da língua inglesa / Temporal resolution and cortical potential in different levels of English proficiency

RESUMO Objetivos: investigar e comparar as habilidades auditivas entre normo-ouvintes bilíngues estudantes de diferentes níveis de proficiência do inglês por meio de teste comportamental e eletrofisiológico. Métodos: este estudo tem caráter descritivo, quantitativo e transversal. A amostra foi composta por 39 sujeitos (alunos de escolas de idiomas: 13 no nível avançado (GA); 13 no nível intermediário (GI); 13 no nível básico (GB)), com idade entre 18 a 35 anos, limiares auditivos tonais dentro dos limites da normalidade e sem queixas de habilidades de processamento auditivo. Foram submetidos aos testes comportamentais: teste de detecção de gap (RGDT); e ao teste eletrofisiológico potencial evocado auditivo de longa latência (PEALL), com estímulos verbais (sílabas /ba/ - frequente - e /di/ - raro) Resultados: verificou-se diferença estatisticamente significante entre as orelhas para: o GB, para a amplitude de N1 e P2, com maiores valores para a orelha esquerda; o GI, para a amplitude de P1, N1 e P2, com maiores valores para a orelha esquerda, o GA, para a latência do componente N1, com maiores valores para a orelha esquerda, e, para as amplitudes dos componentes P2, N2 e P3, com maiores valores para a orelha esquerda. Entre os grupos, o teste RGDT mostrou menores valores para GA e para latência do componente N1, com maiores valores para o GB. Conclusões: pode-se concluir que o nível de proficiência avançado da língua inglesa estimula a velocidade de conexões neurais desencadeando a ocorrência mais rápida do potencial N1, assim a habilidade de resolução temporal é significantemente melhor à medida que o tempo de estudo aumenta.

ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate and compare hearing abilities in normal hearing bilingual students, at different levels of English proficiency (basic, intermediate and advanced), using behavioral testing and electrophysiological testing. Methods: this study is descriptive, quantitative and transversal. The sample consisted of 60 subjects (language schools students at different English proficiency levels: 20 at advanced level (AG); 20 at intermediate level (IG); 20 at basic level (BG)) with normal hearing and no complaints about auditory processing abilities, aged 18-35 years. They were subjected to behavioral test: Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) that assesses ability of temporal resolution; and electrophysiological test Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (LLAEP) with verbal stimuli (syllables /ba/ - frequent stimulus and /di/ - rare stimulus) evaluating memory, attention and auditory discrimination. Results: it was noticed a statistically significant difference between ears for: BG, to amplitude of N1 and P2, with higher values for left ear; IG to amplitude of P1, N1 and P2, with higher values for left ear; AG to latency of N1, with higher values for left ear, and amplitudes of components P2, N2 and P3, with higher values for left ear. Between groups, RGDT showed lower values of AG, and latency of N1 component, with higher values for BG. Conclusion: there were significant differences in temporal resolution ability, better for students in advanced level of English and also to the latency of evoked cortical N1 with higher values for students at a basic level.